Possible Facial Nerve Monitoring Blunder…
Facial nerve monitoring is one of the things that we as intraoperative neurophysiologist can perform with a high level of certainty Because of the amount of research demonstrating its usefulness, the information we give back to the surgeon is indeed on par with what is happening from a functional standpoint.
To say it differently…this ain’t monitoring EEG of depth of anesthesia.
But there are some fine points to this procedure that I’m not sure everyone performing it is completely aware of… and should be. This goes for the intraoperative neurophysiologist, the remote monitoring physician and the surgeon.
To lead up to what I’m referring to, let’s walk through a typical cerebellopontine angle surgery that has an atypical triggered EMG response while you’re performing facial nerve monitoring during surgery.
Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery And Monitoring The Facial Nerve
The surgeon has exposed the tumor and retracted the cerebellum out of the way. There is no facial nerve free-running EMG, and your SSEP and BAER are still tracing along with baselines. So far, so good.
The surgeon sees the tumor (it’s pretty big and a bit of a tight squeeze in there), and now it’s time to start identifying structures. S/he wants to be able to decipher the tumor from nerve, as well as get some information as to the functional integrity of the facial nerve.
First the surgeon goes deep and stimulates the trigeminal nerve. You know this because you set up a channel in the masseter, and the latency was about 3-4 ms. Looks good.
Then the surgeon stimulates what s/he thinks is going to be the facial nerve. You’re at 0.3 mA and a pulse width of 100 usec, and you see the orbicularis oris start to fire off at around 11 ms.
Facial nerve CMAP at 11 ms?
That’s odd??? That’s not really the sweet spot for the facial nerve. It usually comes in around 5-7 ms, maybe a little earlier. Maybe it’s because the tumor stretched the nerve, making it a longer trip? Or maybe there’s some compression and the nerve’s conduction speed is hindered?
And look at that… you have the nasalis, orbicularis oculi and frontalis all covered, yet those remained quiet. The facial nerve doesn’t branch till it’s up by the parotid, so you know it’s not that.
Also, something just didn’t look right in the free-running EMG when it stimulated (you just happened to glance there too). It was a pretty weak response, and it had some larger than normal spaces between the responses. Come to think of it, you’re triggered EMG window looked kind of flat too. The morphology of the wave wasn’t that crisp response you’re used to seeing. The CMAP was low amplitude and longer duration.
Here’s what it might look like, and what the surgeon is seeing at that point…
What you’ve seen is not typical for facial nerve stimulation, but rather for nervus intermedius stimulation. While most know the nervus intermedius for its sensory and special senses distributions, it actually has motor fibers to the orbicularis oris too.
If the surgeon has located the nervus intermedius, but because it stimulated the orbicularis oris, s/he might think they’ve found the facial nerve. S/he might find themselves in a predicament. The main trunk of the facial nerve can be in a completely different location of the cerebellopontine angle. If they start debulking tumor under false pretenses, they could possibly cause some facial nerve trauma.
So you step your cranial nerve monitoring game up…
When you see this presentation (a low amplitude, longer latency of just “off” looking morphology that only stimulates the obercularis oris), you need to suggest to the surgeon to continue looking for the trunk of the facial nerve.
Well, that’s a nice little piece of information for you. But what else could you take away from this?
How about this…
The next time you’re doing a cerebellopontine angle tumor case, check to see if there is any motor weakness. If there is weakness (even better yet, they actually did neurodiagnositic studies ahead of time and there was a localized denervation potentials) only in the orbicularis oris, you might be able to “discuss” with the surgeon about how the tumor is probably affecting the nervus intermedius, and that your facial nerve monitoring should help localize that area. That’s very hard for MRI imaging to do (intermediate nerve schwannoma vs facial nerve schwannoma), so you might be his/her eyes on the inside. What a superstar you’ll be!
And if you need a little brush up on facial nerve anatomy, check out Dr.Najeeb
Here are some related guides and posts that you might enjoy next.
Double-Train MEP On A Comeback Kick Using transcranial electric motor evoked potentials in the operating room has become routine practice for spinal cord monitoring. Recent improvements in the ability to record tcMEP have resulted in increased use during other...read more
How Resourceful Of A Neuromonitoring Tech Are You? First off, let me start this topic off by saying that I'm not a big fan of the term neuromonitoring tech (I prefer surgical neurophysiologist or SNP). But I really want to address those in the field that might embrace...read more
Loss of Cortical SSEP Due To Loss of Receptor Activation Earlier in this 30 Days of Neuromonitoring series, I wrote about cortical and subcortical reorganization after a loss of afferent feedback from carpal tunnel syndrome and how that affects intraoperative...read more
The CNIM vs The Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Degree (Joe's notes: This is a GUEST POST by Josh Mergos, who is the director of the Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Program at the University of Michigan - School of Kinesiology. We met for the first time during a small...read more
Optimizing Sub-cortical SSEP There is 1 electrode that I see get misused in somatosensory evoked potentials more so than any other electrode in any modality. This is the electrode placed over the cervical spine (or sometimes around the ear or mastoid) and generally...read more
The Trapezius Muscle In Intraoperative Neuromonitoring If we follow the same medical textbooks we used in school to pass a test, then we know for sure that the motor portion of the trapezius is innervated by the spinal accessory nerve (CN 11) and the sensory portion...read more