The CNIM Test Is The Make Or Break Of IONM
As a young boy, I didn’t dream of passing the CNIM test and watch my career in IOM take off. Like everyone else I’ve met who does neuromonitoring, I kind of just fell into this. But I’m glad I did.
I soon learned that in order to create value for myself in this industry, I had to get some more credentials. Namely the CNIM.
Passing the CNIM test is a major milestone in IOM.
And it’s no walk in the park.
If you’ve read my About Me section, then you know I’m a former OT and chiropractic neurologist. That means I’ve spent years in anatomy, neurology and physiology labs and classes, not to mention time in practice. Plus the fact that I did electrodiagnostic testing in my office, I think I had an almost ideal background for IOM. I’ve also been fortunate enough to work with some really great people who have helped along the way.
But when I go to IOM meetings or chat online to other people in neuromonitoring, I talk to people from all different backgrounds. Doctors, nurses, surgical technicians, business majors, etc. A lot of people have expressed their disappointment in their company or hospital’s training.
Even so, when I first found out about the pass rate of the CNIM exam, I was shocked at the rate of failure. I didn’t even realize other the success/failure rate of the exam when I took it. Just about everyone I knew passed it the first time.
Here’s an image that I got straight off of ABRET’s site (click the image below if you want to see some more of their “very discouraging” stats)
We’re talking about a 55-60% pass rate. I’ve talked to some people who didn’t pass it, and most seemed to be more than capable of running cases and handling problems as they arise. Something here isn’t right.
And as for people (like me) that tend to poke out their chest and tell you about their very expensive qualifications (like I did above), they don’t seem to fare much better on the CNIM test.
After taking the CNIM test myself, here’s where I felt there was a disconnect:
- The test questions are similar to what you might find in an academic institute. That would be OK, if the people who were taking it came from an academic institute. There are some programs out there, but they are still a very small percentage of people taking the test. The responsibility falls on the private company or hospital to provide this type of schooling, which some either don’t or can’t.
- What you need to learn to set up and run a case on a day-to-day basis isn’t a large enough portion of the test. The minutia dominates… and it should. If you’re monitoring primarily benign surgeries, you can fake your way through your career for a pretty good amount of time. You might only see 2-3 cases per year that can expose the underprepared.
- There isn’t enough quality information to prepare you properly for the exam.
Like Confucius says…
“Success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure.”
And here’s a tip for all of those who are planning on taking CNIM test. Spend some time in preparation for the material you will be using to prepare for the exam. Make an outline of topics you need to cover. Go narrow and go wide. Use the Merlin method to guarantee success.
Do NOT sleep on this test.
It’s a bear.
It’s what’s standing between you, job security and higher pay (think opportunity cost here).
Prepare right or prepare to be discouraged.
Here are some related guides and posts that you might enjoy next.
What To Expect From The Neuromonitoring Field In The Future? Anyone else want to make some predictions about the neuromonitoring field? Let's talk about what we can expect out of neuromonitoring in the near future. This line of conversation seems to come up a lot....read more
Double-Train MEP On A Comeback Kick Using transcranial electric motor evoked potentials in the operating room has become routine practice for spinal cord monitoring. Recent improvements in the ability to record tcMEP have resulted in increased use during other...read more
How Resourceful Of A Neuromonitoring Tech Are You? First off, let me start this topic off by saying that I'm not a big fan of the term neuromonitoring tech (I prefer surgical neurophysiologist or SNP). But I really want to address those in the field that might embrace...read more
Loss of Cortical SSEP Due To Loss of Receptor Activation Earlier in this 30 Days of Neuromonitoring series, I wrote about cortical and subcortical reorganization after a loss of afferent feedback from carpal tunnel syndrome and how that affects intraoperative...read more
The CNIM vs The Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Degree (Joe's notes: This is a GUEST POST by Josh Mergos, who is the director of the Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Program at the University of Michigan - School of Kinesiology. We met for the first time during a small...read more
Optimizing Sub-cortical SSEP There is 1 electrode that I see get misused in somatosensory evoked potentials more so than any other electrode in any modality. This is the electrode placed over the cervical spine (or sometimes around the ear or mastoid) and generally...read more